Dion Gordon, Canterbury

In 2019, Canterbury dairy farmer Dion Gordon experienced something of a nightmare. The Rangitata River burst its banks, flowed onto his farm and took a huge swathe of topsoil out to sea. Dion had no choice but to drop stock numbers - but what happened next was a surprise. 

Video

Learn how Dion and the team are reducing greenhouse gas emissions on their South Canterbury dairy farm.

Transcript

Duration: 7:49

DION GORDON

December 2019, State Highway 1 was cut off.

We lost approximately about 25 hectares of land. The water came through and took all the topsoil off, damaged a pivot, damaged a power cable, and lost quite a bit of fencing.

So, we made a decision pretty quickly and destocked this place to take the pressure off the land and the people and the animals.

We were running about 1,560 cows with quite a bit of imported feed and once SH1 main road opened then we took the cows off.

We'd lost 25 hectares, so we took 25 hectares equivalent of stock off. Some of that land started to come back in the following season but we didn’t stock the farm right up. We stocked it as if that land wasn't there.

And since then as we've got about half that land back, we still haven't increased the stocking rate. We've just tried to do a better job with what we've got.

So, our per cow production has increased over that time. Our mating results have gone up over that time. And our need for imported feed has decreased over that time.

We were always 4.1 cows to the hectare stocking rate. We sort of dropped back to 4-3.9. This coming season we'll drop back to between 3.8 and 3.85.

In that time, also, the rules have changed with how much nitrogen we're allowed to apply. Probably in 2016-17 when we were more highly stocked, we were applying 270 units of N. And then 2018-19 we started to bring it back and we were down to about 240 and then we got down in 2020 before the restrictions came in to about 220. So, as we were decreasing our stocking rate that was the same as when we were decreasing our nitrogen.

We could've carried on and just kept buying in feed and feeding the cows that we had but I think it just would have put a lot of stress on my team. And I didn't want that. So they were milking a few less cows so they weren't constantly having to be in the silage wagon or constantly over-worked.

We supply Synlait Milk here and we're Lead with Pride accredited, so what that means is we get independently audited once a year and as part of that audit process, Synlait has now brought in a greenhouse gas emissions programme. And that's worth a premium to us.

If you meet certain criteria, you might get an extra 1c, 2c or 3c. Our aim is always to get the 3c premium. It's quite a useful tool that Synlait has brought in and that has made us think a little bit more about what we do on farm. Not just cows and grass but energy efficiency in sheds and pumps and all of those sort of things as well.

This farm, we want to leave the land this same or better than what we've taken it over. We've gone to more efficient irrigation so we're not wasting water. We've got moisture probes around the farm to make sure that when we do need water that we're using it efficiently and that we're not wasting it. Same with the river that we've done the plantings. So, we're not putting stock on area that's floodable or things like that.

We've DNA profiled all our herd so that we're running the most efficient converters of grass and feed into milk and that means we've managed to run a few less cows.

Our cows are more efficient, our people are more efficient, our use of water is more efficient and obviously that's helped bring our greenhouse gases down.

So yeah, going forward, hopefully we're just going to keep building on that and keep the efficiencies going and hopefully keep it as a profitable business going forward.

 

Download this story

Download a copy of the Kirikiri dairy story here [PDF, 536 KB]

About the farm

Kirikiri is a 400 hectare, irrigated coastal dairy farm in Canterbury, south of Ashburton beside the Rangitata River. 

Dion and Kristie Gordon took over the property in 2014 in an equity partnership with Craigmore Sustainables. Kirikiri spans two farms, employs eight staff and winters 1,450 cows. 

The physical parameters of Kirikiri are shown in the table below:

  2018 2020 2022 2022 v 2018
Effective area (ha) 397.3 397.3 397.3 0
Cows wintered 1,484 1,471 1,454 -2.0%
Dry matter eaten (tonnes) 16.0 17.6 17.0 3.6%
Total kg MS 596,634 641,262 630,599 5.7%
kg/MS/cow 411 436 448 9.0%
Aerial photograph of flat paddocks with cows grazing beside a wide strip of trees and plantings on the side of the Rangitata River

Kirikiri dairy farm (Photo: Dave Allen Photography)

The farm is a mix of heavy and light soils. This serves them well as the seasons change, with the light soils supporting good growth in the spring and the heavier soils holding onto moisture in the dry periods. It supports a pasture mix of ryegrass, white clover and plantain, and they supplement with a small amount of PKE, silage and wheat fed in the shed. 

Flooding has been a major issue in the past, including 25 hectares of land lost when the Rangitata burst its banks in December 2019.

GHG numbers

The environment has always been at the heart of Dion’s approach to farming. “We want to leave this land even better than when we took over”, he says.

Greenhouse gas numbers have been calculated using Overseer and their results from 2018 to 2022 can be seen in the table below.

  2018 2022 % change 2022 v 2018
Methane (Tonnes CO2e) 4,211 4,251 1%
Methane (Tonnes CH4)* 168 170 1%
Nitrous oxide (Tonnes CO2e) 1,391 1,152 -17%
Total GHG (Tonnes CO2e)** 6,992 6,357 -9%

*The weight of methane is shown here without conversion to carbon dioxide equivalence (CO2-e) because this is how it will be reported in the farm-level pricing mechanism.

**Includes CO2 emissions from fertiliser, noting that these will not be included in the farm-level pricing mechanism. 

As shown in the table above, total emissions and nitrous oxide emissions have decreased over the period since 2018. Methane emissions have risen slightly, albeit declined from 2021 to 2022. This is likely due to fewer cows eating more feed now than in 2018.

As well as reducing emissions, the changes have resulted in less nitrogen losses from the system.

Dion uses OverseerFM for Kirikiri farm’s greenhouse gas numbers. To find out more about this tool and others, see our Know Your Numbers page

On-farm actions

Three main actions led to the reductions in emissions achieved on Kirkiri since 2018: 

  • Decreased N fertiliser from 279 kgN/ha to 148 kgN/ha to meet the 190 kgN/ha nitrogen cap – decreased nitrous oxide and carbon dioxide emissions.
  • Decreased stocking rate from 3.8 peak cows/ha to 3.6 peak cows/ha. This reduction was offset by an increase in milk production/cow from 411 kgMS/cow to 448 kgMS/cow, 1,502 kgMS/ha to 1,587 kgMS/ha, and total milk production from 596,634 kgMS to 630,599 kgMS – increased methane and decreased nitrous oxide emissions.
  • Decreased supplements fed from 1,595 tDM to 1,189 tDM – increased pasture intake and utilisation, less processing of supplements and decreased supplements made on farm – decreased carbon dioxide emissions.

To read more about how these actions and others reduce agricultural greenhouse gas emissions, see our Current Actions page.

What led to the changes?

The focus on emissions began in 2018 when they had a higher than usual empty rate, but didn’t want to buy in more animals. This led to a reduced stocking rate (of around 2%), which worked so they continued with it.

The process was further helped by the flooding in December 2019, which wiped out around 25 hectares. They destocked the equivalent, and even after that land had been restored, they didn't restock to the same level, instead retiring and planting flood prone areas. 

"We've just tried to do a better job with what we've got," says Dion.

Cows in a rotary milking shed with a female dairy worker

Milking at Kirikiri farm (Photo: Dave Allen Photography)

A focus on feed budgeting and management helped drive per cow performance. They have also improved the quality of cows and in-calf rate. Milking times are now shorter, which means the farm team can pay closer attention to animal health and are more focused on getting all of the elements of the farm system right. They have also decreased their nitrogen use. 

These changes were incremental over the years following 2018, during which time there has been regular reviews of the system, ongoing feed budgeting, and adapting to other drivers including local freshwater regulations and expectations from Synlait, who they supply to.

Future changes

Further refinement of the system is planned over the next 1-3 years, including selling poor performing cows earlier, and potentially reducing stocking rate further or maintaining the stocking rate but buying-in higher BW cows.

They would also consider reducing the stocking rate and growing their own maize (rather than buying-in) if the Government’s farm-level pricing system for agricultural greenhouse gases has a significant impact on profit beyond 2025.

Advice for other farmers

Below are some suggestions from Dion to help other farmers get their heads around the opportunities and challenges in reducing agricultural greenhouse gas emissions and adapting to a changing climate: 

  • Be engaged – this means understanding what your greenhouse gas numbers are and what they mean to your farm so you can think about what you might do about them. It is also about knowing how policy may impact you.
  • Bring someone in to provide constructive advice – this will be more effective than regulation (at least regulation on its own).
  • Focus on what you can do and what you can control.
  • A lot of gains are made by doing the basics better – strive for operational best practice and that benefits the broader business as well.

"A lot of gains are made by doing the basics better," says Dion. "A lot of these changes are not as hard as you think, and you're probably doing more than you realise."

Know your numbers and have a plan

By now, all farmers and growers must have a record of their annual on-farm greenhouse gas emissions (methane and nitrous oxide). By the end of 2024, they'll also need to have a written plan in place to manage them. These requirements are part of the He Waka Eke Noa partnership and are intended to help get farmers ready for agricultural greenhouse gas emissions to be priced from 2025. To find out more on how to do this, see our Know Your Numbers page