Kereru Station, Hastings District

Kereru Station is a sheep and beef property located in the Kereru district, west of Hastings in the Hawke’s Bay. It has a total of 2,848 hectares of flat to medium hill country, with 730 hectares made up of gorges and plantation forestry.

Video

Overview

The property is split into two blocks, a finishing operation situated at the main Kereru Station, and Thorn Flat, the breeding operation that lies under the Ruahine Range.

The station is owned by two Trusts which run it as a partnership. Profits are used to support Hawke’s Bay organisations in need, primarily those involved in education. The station employs a general manager, who works alongside a three-person advisory team to deliver the farm strategy. The two blocks are run as separate units, each with its own manager, reporting to the general manager. 

The station has an effective area of 1840 hectares and runs 21,500 stock units including 500 ewes, a 200-beef cow breeding herd and its replacements, and 850 Friesian bulls. In addition, more than 20,000 lambs are traded annually. 

The property is well-resourced and has a high level of modern, innovative infrastructure for example, automatic sheep weighing and drafting and new sheep yards. 

What changes have been made?

The farm has been in the epicentre of a series of droughts in the Hawke’s Bay. This caused large fluctuations in farm financial surpluses, which not only took time to recover from, but also meant the charitable organisations dependent on donations from Kereru were unable to operate with any certainty. The key motivation for change therefore was to develop a more financially sustainable operation, which also resulted in reductions in GHG emissions.

 

Table 1: Changes in production 

 

2010

2012

2014

2016

2018

2020†

2022

Effective area (ha) 

945

945

945

945

911

911

911

Total eaten (t DM grazed per ha)

8.02

8.26

8.16

8.61

8.86

8.11

8.43

RSU/ grazed ha

14.6

15

14.8

15.7

16.1

14.8

15.3

Feed conversion (kg DM/ kg prod)

24.9

21.7

23.6

26.6

23.3

29.1

22.5

Kg meat and wool / grazed ha

322

380

345

324

379

279

375

Gross margin ($/ha) *

$1,126

$1,623

$839

$1,334

$1,472

$1,043

$1,675

EFS/ha*

$28

$385

-$265

$159

$299

-$87

$239

* expressed in 2023 dollars. † a drought year where supplements were fed

The declining and volatile farm profitability at Kereru Station between 2010 and 2022 is shown in Figure 1.

 

Figure 1: Profitability of Kereru Station 2010-2022 

Since 2021 the farm has shifted from running a significant amount of breeding stock, where the maintenance percentage of their annual feed intake is high, to a trading and finishing system. The latter is a more flexible livestock policy where the buying and selling options are greater. This allows feed demand and supply to be better matched. It is a more efficient model where the majority feed intake results in live weight gain which in turn has led to GHG emissions efficiency gains.

What have been the impacts of the changes?

There has been a 17 percent reduction in biological GHG emissions per effective hectare between 2010 and 2022 (Table 2).

 

Table 2: GHG emissions 

 

2010

2012

2014

2016

2018

2020

2022

% Change 2022 vs 2010

Methane t CO₂e/ total ha

3.64

3.49

3.43

3.61

3.81

3.41

3.01

-17%

Methane t CH/ total ha

0.15

0.14

0.14

0.14

0.15

0.14

0.12

-17%

Nitrous oxide t COe/ total ha

0.88

0.85

0.91

0.85

0.87

0.92

0.67

-24%

Total biological t COe/ effective ha

4.68

4.59

4.54

4.46

4.67

4.34

3.94

-17%

Total biological t COe/ total ha

4.52

4.34

4.34

4.46

4.67

4.34

3.68

-19%

Total biological t COe/ kg product

16.2

14.0

15.6

17.1

14.9

19.1

14.0

-14%

 

Figure 2: Changes and trends in GHG emissions

Production of meat and wool per hectare has increased whilst greenhouse gas emissions have decreased (Figure 3).

 

Figure 3: Production and greenhouse gas emissions per hectare

What process did they go through to make the changes?

In 2021, a full strategic plan was developed, incorporating the Trusts’ visions for the future of the property. Business discussions and decisions are based around four key pillars within the plan – people, planet, progress and profit. The four pillars are seen as vital, and they seek a balance to deliver them all. While the emphasis to date has been on improving financial resilience, the planet pillar also includes a conscious drive to reduce the station’s greenhouse gas emissions.

Decisions were made to increase the farms’ resilience to climate change. This has led to having more flexible stock policies that can respond quickly to the unpredictability of the climate.

What other changes are planned?

A new dam that holds 650,000 m³ of water, providing up to 340 mm/ha/year of pivot irrigation to 200 hectares of flats has recently been completed. This will decrease pasture and crop production variability and help deliver consistent and reliable financial returns.

In the future, the owners of Kereru Station will continue their appraisal of appropriate land use across the whole farm, including forestry and land retirement options on some low performing hill country.

The main driver in being climate resilient is for steady financials, and the Trust continues to investigate how it would like to see the landscape in 50 to 100 years and beyond. They are undertaking long-term modelling to determine the value of the breeding unit to the overall operation and how alternative land uses, such as production forestry and indigenous plantings, could benefit the trustee vision and goals. This is constrained around continuing to be able to provide the Trust the financial returns that are required by the Trusts’ benefactors. Key focus areas are continued monitoring, investigation of options and people development.

What advice do they have for other farmers?

Key advice offered is:

  • Ongoing collection of farm performance data enables continuous monitoring and management decisions to be made rapidly and with confidence. 
  • The use of decision support tools to aid in monitoring, decision making, and the reviewing process is vital.
  • Continuously look for new options and don’t be frightened to seek outside help to guide thinking through an analytical process.
  • Farmers need to view themselves as land managers who farm according to their long-term vision. To do this, farmers need to take time to look at the farming operation at a distance rather than always being fully immersed in day-to-day operational requirements.

Published: July 22, 2025